JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)July 13, 1995

A- de 1995

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice José Gregorio Hernández Galindo

✓Claimant Pablo Horn Adolfi

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto Negativo De Competencia En Tutela.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se declaró que la Sala Penal de la Corte Suprema de Justicia, en su calidad de superior jerárquico común, es competente para decidir sobre el conflicto de competencias negativo, surgido entre dos Juzgados Penal Municipal.

En consecuencia, se ordena enviar el expediente a la Sala en mención para que defina el conflicto de competencias entre los Juzgados aludidos.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. Primero. DECLARAR que la Sala Penal de la Corte Suprema de Juzticia, en su calidad de superior jerárquico comú, es competente para decidir sobre el conflicto de competencias negativo, surgido entre el Juzgado
  2. Primero. Penal Municipal de Soacha y el Juzgado Sesenta y Dos Penal Municipal de Santafé de Bogotá.
  3. Segundo. ORDENAR el envío del expediente a la H. Corte Suprema de Justicia -Sala Penal-, para que defina el conflicto de competencias entre los Juzgados
  4. Primero. Penal Municipal de Soacha y Sesenta y Dos Penal Municipal de Bogotá.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.